Editorial Policies

 
Correction and Retraction Policy
 

In some cases, the post-publication commentary on a published manuscript can involve challenges, clarifications, and replication of the published work; this can be published online, with a reply from the authors, after peer review.
Disagreements over interpretation, complaints and any other matters arising should be addressed to the editor in chief of the JKIMSU journal. Editorial decisions in such cases are based on considerations of reader interest, the novelty of arguments, the integrity of the publication record and fairness to the parties involved.
Corrections are published for significant errors in non-peer-reviewed content of the JKIMSU journals at the judgment of the editors. Readers who have recognized such an error should send an email to the email address of the journal, mentioning the publication reference, title, author of the article, and briefly explaining the error.

Notification of invalid results that affect the reliability of a previously published article and such original article is marked as retracted but remains available to readers, and the retraction statement notifying readers of the invalidity of the published paper.



About Journal

Aim and Scope

Authorship

Contribution Details

How to write a scientific paper

Types of Manuscripts and Limits

Conflicts of Interest

Confidentiality

Plagiarism and Fabrication
Image integrity and standards

Peer-review policy

Review Process
Selecting peer-reviewers
Manuscript Review Report
Timing
Anonymity
Double Blind Peer Review

Editing Referees' Reports

Peer-Review System

Reviewing Peer Review

Availability of Data

Ethics and Biosecurity

Correction and Retraction Policy