It is the duty of journals to manage an effective review system. Peer review is intended to select precisely suitable research of significant interest. Referees are likely to recognize flaws, advice improvements, and judge innovation. Referees desire for only the innovative manuscript should be published and the author wishes for quick publication of their fresh ideas. Therefore, it is the job of the editors to manage both authors and referees.
Editors of the journal do not expect peer review to search out skillfully hidden, intentional deceptions. A peer reviewer can only assess what the authors chose to comprise in the manuscript. Editors are constantly impressed with peer review's positive impact on the manuscript we publish. Even papers that are misunderstood by reviewers are regularly rewritten and improved before resubmission. The author made the mistakes, however, peer review, through meticulous effort on the part of referees, helps to care for the literature, encourages high-quality science, and chooses the best. |
